- my first reaction was: cool, it might encourage more people to write a book review. (I read tons of books and have only written a few reviews.)
- My second reaction was: mmm, I don’t believe in external motivation.
- My third reaction was: ok but there is no guarantee, that you win. And as I wrote earlier, irregular feedback works better.
- My forth reaction was: I hope someone wins who has already given a review before he announced this.
Tonight Jurgen twittered that I had won the price because I wrote this review. (For the record yes I wrote this months before Jurgen announced his contest. He did not even ask me to add my opinion to amazon)
Update: Another example of why it’s never good to write blogpost late at night and post it without someone re-reading it. (Then why do I edit this after midnight again?)
Let’s make it clear, I am happy that Jurgen did this action. I do accept the price. Thank you Jurgen for that. What this blog post is about, is what will I do with the amazon check.
I’m puzzled what to do with it.
There are a few reasons why I think I should
not accept this price, accept the price and give it back to the community.
1) At least once a week I get phonecalls for jobs offers, when I am not interested, these recruiters always ask if I don’t know anybody else who fit the profile. And then they try to bribe me into selling people out. I think this is unethical. When I know a good person that is looking for work, I will forward them the job offer and I don’t want to receive any money for that. Giving money for this is a short term solution. It means that some people will be tempted to give away either names of people they don’t respect, and kill their own reputation. Or they give the names of good people they are now working with (or previous worked with). When these people are not actively looking for work this is distroying a team/company etc. Don’t get me wrong I do forward the jobs to the good people I know are looking for a job. I just don’t like the selling out principle. I do tell the recruiters I am not interested in their money for this kind of unethical acts.
(Update: Let make this clear I think that accepting the money is unethical. I’m not talking about offering the money. I don’t care, that is their responisbility.)
Similar to this, it feels that keeping money for my review makes it less valuable (and the same for all the other reviews I made on amazon or linkedin.)
2) When I was studying, I was living of wellfare. I had about 375 euro a month to live from. The first year I did not even had a computer (kinda hard considering I was studying IT). For a few years I had the idea that I would like to “sponsor” a few kids that are in the same situation I was. And give them 10 good IT books to get them started. (Books that I wished I had read before I started.) I was thinking about these 19 non IT books or these 10 agile books. Although I think I contacted a friend who works at the local wellfare office, I never started the idea for real. This could be a first step.
For them these 200 dollar wurth of books would make a huge difference.
Reasons to keep it:
I could use the money to buy my wife or my kids some nice books. They are the once that suffer from all my extra curriculum activities (Instead of writing the review(or this blog post), I could have hugged them instead.)
(This is not entirely true as amazon does not sell many Dutch books)
So I turn this into a community thing: do you have any other idea’s what I could do with the amazon gift?
Although I don’t give you a reward for answering, I still hope for a lots of idea’s.
I will decide myself what I will do.
Update: To make clear Jurgen does not give 200 dollar, he gives an amazon gift for 200 dollar to buy books.
Update 2: What was not clear, I am very happy that Jurgen does experiments like this. I see my blogpost as a way to get feedback about this experiment. I did not say properly thank tou to Jurgen about the offer. For which I want to apologize.
Thank you Jurgen for the offer.